Perhaps no filmmaker has ever benefitted from re-evaluation as much asStanley Kubrick. As hard as it is to believe, classics such as2001: A Space Odyssey,Barry Lyndon, andThe Shiningwere intensely divisive upon their initial releases. Within a decade, however, people would realize these singular works of art defied easy categorization and were more thoughtfully constructed than initially perceived.
In a strange irony, Kubrick once called his final film,Eyes Wide Shut, his “greatest contribution to cinema,” yet it’s one of his few that remains polarizing. Only in the last few years have critics been starting to come around to a master’s haunting swansong, though there are still detractors who consider it dull and pretentious. Removed from initial expectations, however,Eyes Wide Shutis, in fact, every bit the equal to the rest of Kubrick’s filmography and a worthy capper to a legendary career.
Why Was Eyes Wide Shut Misunderstood?
Eyes Wide Shut
Eyes Wide Shut is a 1999 drama mystery directed by Stanley Kubrick centering on a Manhattan doctor who goes to unexpected lengths to please his wife after she admits she was unsatisfied and almost had an affair a year earlier. Eyes Wide Shut stars Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman as husband and wife.
Ever since cameras started rolling forEyes Wide Shutin 1996 (filming would ultimately last over a year), theerotic Christmas thrillerwas shrouded in secrecy. Stanley Kubrick had become much less prolific in recent years, with almost a decade having passed since his previous feature,Full Metal Jacket, which itself came eight years afterThe Shining. All that was known was that he considered it his biggest passion project and maybe his masterpiece.
By the time the film was finally awaiting release, the unthinkable occurred. Stanley Kubrick died of a heart attack only six days after screening his final cut of the movie for Warner Bros. Without their famously exacting auteur in their corner to guide promotional material, the executives, still keeping the plot vague, marketedEyes Wide Shutas an erotic thriller, while also building interest by hyping up the stars, Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman, at the time a real-life couple.
Tom Cruise Saved One Steven Spielberg Movie by Not Starring in It: “It’s Not a Great Idea for Me to Do This Movie.”
Tom Cruise has always had his finger on the pulse, and that proved to be correct about a 1998 movie he declined to appear in.
While critical reception was positive overall, and the box office returns were profitable, many were vocally baffled. What was advertised as a tense, steamy sexual thriller was instead a slow, dreamlike psychological drama, with the only bit of the much-hyped explicit sexual content occurring in the infamous orgy scene. Even a few select critics felt it was a dull, ponderous end to a master’s career.
Additionally, the build-up of Cruise and Kidman’s involvement also seemed to backfire on Warner Bros., as Kidman, whofollowed odd rules while filming with Cruise, was sidelined for long stretches of the runtime. And few knew what to make of Tom Cruise’s performance, as he played wildly against type, subverting his image as a heartthrob to an insecure, sexually frustrated loon. Simply put, audiences felt tricked; surely this couldn’t have been the film Stanley Kubrick considered his finest.
Why Eyes Wide Shut Is Actually Great
Removed from these initial expectations,Eyes Wide Shutis as deliberate and meticulous in its craft asDr. Strangeloveor2001. In fact, part of what makes the film so great is that it goes out of its way to subvert what viewers are looking for. This wasn’t an erotic thriller but a thoughtful drama about intimacy and sexual frustration. The entire point is that the much-hyped explicit content wasn’t there; it’s the only fitting way to tell the story of an emasculated man (Cruise gives one of his best performances, for the record) trying and failing to have an affair.
Admittedly, the context of the film’s conception explains much about the intent here. Stanley Kubrick first discovered Arthur Schnitzler’s erotic novella “Dream Story” in the ’60s. For years, he dreamed of adapting it as a farcical sex comedy and even consideredTom Hanks, Woody Allen, and Bill Murrayfor roles, which explains the surrealist journey Cruise’s character undertakes in the final film. However, it seems safe to assume that his biggest interest was in the story’s frank depictions of marital complications and that he had a personal attachment since he was married three times and struggled with intimacy for years.
Obviously, much to-do has been made about the secret society behind the orgy and what they symbolize, but at heart,Eyes Wide Shutis arguably Kubrick’s most personal film and certainly one of his most weirdly hopeful. True, the frankness of the sexual content can initially be off-putting, but it serves the story about the cracks in a couple’s marriage. As he’s done throughout his career, Kubrick paints the darker side of human nature (this time, the difficulties of being faithful to a partner) without judgment and with full objectivity.
However, it’s only in breaking down the image of a picture-perfect marriage and coming to terms with said darker impulses that Cruise and Kidman’s characters are able to (seemingly) pull through. The final scene in thisstrange romance movie(with one of the best final lines in a film ever) displays their dedication to working through their difficulties and reaffirming their love for one another. For one of cinema’s most notoriously cynical filmmakers, there’s an emotional honesty here that’s strangely beautiful.
Eyes Wide Shut Ending, Explained
Eyes Wide Shut is the final film of legendary filmmaker Stanley Kubrick, and delivers a brilliant ending with many ambiguous messages and symbolism.
One of Kubrick’s Absolute Best
In a career full of iconic works,Eyes Wide Shutdeserves to be called one ofStanley Kubrick’s best films. It’s admittedly not for everyone, and if you go in expecting a steamy erotic thriller, you’re bound for disappointment. But put aside these expectations, and you’ll find a dreamlike, bizarre, but somehow weirdly poignant exploration of what it means to be committed to a loved one. It’s so unlike the rest of his filmography, but to this day, it’s still unlike anything else out there, and if Kubrick considered this his masterpiece, it’s easy to see why.
